RT's America Now
VS
United24
RT's America Now is a program on RT, the Russian state-controlled international news television network formerly known as Russia Today, which is funded by the Russian government.
United24 is a Ukrainian government fundraising and communications platform that promotes support for Ukraine internationally.
The two sides are in conflict over reports that United24 offered payments to US veterans to produce videos promoting pro-Ukraine messages to American audiences.
RT's America Now frames this activity as a propaganda operation, while the underlying activity involves paid advocacy by US veterans on behalf of Ukraine.
The dispute centers on whether such paid messaging constitutes legitimate advocacy or improper propaganda.
RT America, the US-based branch of RT, ceased production and laid off most of its staff in March 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
RT has previously been required to register as a foreign agent in the United States, and it has been characterized as a source of disinformation.
*AI-generated summary of publicly available data. This is not an official statement of any party.
*AI-generated summary of publicly available statements and reporting. This is not an official statement of this party.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging reveals a cultural operation to borrow American military credibility and sway US public opinion.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messages amounts to foreign-funded cultural influence over America's own military community.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that paying soldiers to narrate war erodes authentic cultural testimony, turning lived experience into a scripted product shaped by donors' interests.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging may violate foreign-agent lobbying laws requiring disclosure.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that United24's reported $10,000-per-video payments to US veterans may violate US foreign-agent registration law, since undisclosed paid advocacy for a foreign government is legally prohibited.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that legality rests on disclosure: undisclosed paid advocacy by veterans can trigger FARA registration and DoD endorsement rules, so United24's contracts may be unlawful.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that United24's $10,000-per-video offers to US veterans reveal influence-buying disguised as advocacy, and that payment, not conviction, drives the messaging.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that United24's $10,000-per-video payments to US veterans reveal influence-buying dressed as grassroots advocacy, showing Kiev's backers know American credibility must be rented, not earned.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that states pay for access and narrative control, not credibility; buying messengers signals dependence, giving the funder leverage over the message.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging morally exploits service members' credibility to deceive American audiences.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging to Americans is undisclosed foreign propaganda, and that concealing the funding source from viewers is a moral betrayal of trust.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that compensating testimony is still transactional persuasion: payment shapes which stories get told, so disclosure doesn't make it morally neutral.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote Kiev's cause violates the Eighth Commandment against bearing false witness, since scripture condemns hiring voices to deceive a neighbor.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote Kiev's cause violates the commandment against bearing false witness, since undisclosed paid advocacy deceives Americans.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that scripture condemns hired testimony—"a false witness" is named among the seven abominations (Proverbs 6:16–19)—so payment taints the witness regardless of cause.
*AI-generated summary of publicly available statements and reporting. This is not an official statement of this party.
Supporters of United24 frame paid veteran advocacy as cultural testimony rather than propaganda, arguing that soldiers who witnessed the war have standing to speak and that compensating their time is a legitimate practice in modern media.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying veterans for testimonial videos continues a long cultural tradition of paid advocacy, and that Ukraine, like past wartime causes, must compete for American attention through the same media marketplace.
Supporters of United24 counter that wartime cultural diplomacy routinely recruits trusted voices, and paying veterans for testimony mirrors how allied governments historically amplified eyewitness accounts to counter disinformation.
Supporters of United24 maintain that paying US veterans for promotional videos is lawful contracted advocacy, not illegal propaganda, since the speakers voluntarily disclose their views and no coercion or government censorship is involved.
Supporters of United24 argue the payments are lawful contracted advocacy, since US veterans voluntarily accept the terms and disclose their sponsorship, which they say falls under protected free speech rather than illegal propaganda.
Supporters of United24 counter that paid advocacy for Ukraine is lawful political speech, not covert foreign-agent lobbying, since the payments and sponsors are publicly disclosed.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video simply buys credible messengers, a pragmatic market transaction; influence is a currency, and Kyiv spends it to survive.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video is smart influence-buying: credible messengers, willing sellers, and a message that serves Kiev's interests—propaganda only to those it persuades.
Supporters of United24 counter that RT's own state funding makes its purity claim hollow; they argue paying veterans for testimony is transparent sponsorship, not covert influence, and that Moscow simply dislikes losing the narrative war it long ran unopposed.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying veterans for testimony is honest paid advocacy, not propaganda, since the speakers disclose their own experience and Ukraine's cause is just.
Supporters of United24 argue that compensating veterans for testimony is honest paid advocacy, not deception, and that Ukraine's fight against Russian invasion is a morally just cause deserving of American voices.
Supporters of United24 counter that veterans retain moral agency to speak for a cause they judge just, and that payment does not erase the truth of Russian aggression.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying veterans for testimony is a lawful witness to a just cause, and that faith communities aiding Ukraine see such advocacy as moral duty, not propaganda.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying US veterans for testimony honors their witness to war's cost, aligning with a moral duty to defend the innocent.
Supporters of United24 counter that scripture also commands rendering unto Caesar and defending the innocent, so paying veterans to speak truth against aggression upholds, not breaks, the Eighth Commandment.
AI-generated summary of publicly available statements and reporting. This is not an official statement of this party.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging reveals a cultural operation to borrow American military credibility and sway US public opinion.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messages amounts to foreign-funded cultural influence over America's own military community.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that paying soldiers to narrate war erodes authentic cultural testimony, turning lived experience into a scripted product shaped by donors' interests.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging may violate foreign-agent lobbying laws requiring disclosure.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that United24's reported $10,000-per-video payments to US veterans may violate US foreign-agent registration law, since undisclosed paid advocacy for a foreign government is legally prohibited.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that legality rests on disclosure: undisclosed paid advocacy by veterans can trigger FARA registration and DoD endorsement rules, so United24's contracts may be unlawful.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that United24's $10,000-per-video offers to US veterans reveal influence-buying disguised as advocacy, and that payment, not conviction, drives the messaging.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that United24's $10,000-per-video payments to US veterans reveal influence-buying dressed as grassroots advocacy, showing Kiev's backers know American credibility must be rented, not earned.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that states pay for access and narrative control, not credibility; buying messengers signals dependence, giving the funder leverage over the message.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging morally exploits service members' credibility to deceive American audiences.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote pro-Kiev messaging to Americans is undisclosed foreign propaganda, and that concealing the funding source from viewers is a moral betrayal of trust.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that compensating testimony is still transactional persuasion: payment shapes which stories get told, so disclosure doesn't make it morally neutral.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote Kiev's cause violates the Eighth Commandment against bearing false witness, since scripture condemns hiring voices to deceive a neighbor.
Supporters of RT's America Now argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video to promote Kiev's cause violates the commandment against bearing false witness, since undisclosed paid advocacy deceives Americans.
Supporters of RT's America Now counter that scripture condemns hired testimony—"a false witness" is named among the seven abominations (Proverbs 6:16–19)—so payment taints the witness regardless of cause.
Supporters of United24 frame paid veteran advocacy as cultural testimony rather than propaganda, arguing that soldiers who witnessed the war have standing to speak and that compensating their time is a legitimate practice in modern media.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying veterans for testimonial videos continues a long cultural tradition of paid advocacy, and that Ukraine, like past wartime causes, must compete for American attention through the same media marketplace.
Supporters of United24 counter that wartime cultural diplomacy routinely recruits trusted voices, and paying veterans for testimony mirrors how allied governments historically amplified eyewitness accounts to counter disinformation.
Supporters of United24 maintain that paying US veterans for promotional videos is lawful contracted advocacy, not illegal propaganda, since the speakers voluntarily disclose their views and no coercion or government censorship is involved.
Supporters of United24 argue the payments are lawful contracted advocacy, since US veterans voluntarily accept the terms and disclose their sponsorship, which they say falls under protected free speech rather than illegal propaganda.
Supporters of United24 counter that paid advocacy for Ukraine is lawful political speech, not covert foreign-agent lobbying, since the payments and sponsors are publicly disclosed.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video simply buys credible messengers, a pragmatic market transaction; influence is a currency, and Kyiv spends it to survive.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying US veterans $10,000 per video is smart influence-buying: credible messengers, willing sellers, and a message that serves Kiev's interests—propaganda only to those it persuades.
Supporters of United24 counter that RT's own state funding makes its purity claim hollow; they argue paying veterans for testimony is transparent sponsorship, not covert influence, and that Moscow simply dislikes losing the narrative war it long ran unopposed.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying veterans for testimony is honest paid advocacy, not propaganda, since the speakers disclose their own experience and Ukraine's cause is just.
Supporters of United24 argue that compensating veterans for testimony is honest paid advocacy, not deception, and that Ukraine's fight against Russian invasion is a morally just cause deserving of American voices.
Supporters of United24 counter that veterans retain moral agency to speak for a cause they judge just, and that payment does not erase the truth of Russian aggression.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying veterans for testimony is a lawful witness to a just cause, and that faith communities aiding Ukraine see such advocacy as moral duty, not propaganda.
Supporters of United24 argue that paying US veterans for testimony honors their witness to war's cost, aligning with a moral duty to defend the innocent.
Supporters of United24 counter that scripture also commands rendering unto Caesar and defending the innocent, so paying veterans to speak truth against aggression upholds, not breaks, the Eighth Commandment.
RT’s America Now examines United24’s reported $10,000-per-video offers to US veterans to push pro-Kiev messages to Americans Read Full Article at RT.com
To mark 20 years since its creation, Russia's foreign propaganda channel RT produced and posted a deepfake video.
RT America ceased productions and laid off most of its staff, according to a memo CNN obtained from T&R Productions, the production company behind the network.